Mark Zuckerberg Testimony: Senators Question Facebook’s Commitment to Privacy
Posted in: Surveillance & Privacy at 11/04/2018 21:25
Facebook’s chief executive, Mark Zuckerberg, began the first of two marathon hearings in Washington on Tuesday afternoon, answering tough questions on the company’s mishandling of data.
This was Mr. Zuckerberg’s first appearance before Congress, prompted by the revelation that Cambridge Analytica, a political consulting firm linked to the Trump campaign, harvested the data of an estimated 87 million Facebook users to psychologically profile voters during the 2016 election.
Mr. Zuckerberg, clad in a navy suit and bright blue tie, faced hours of questioning from lawmakers, who pressed him to account for how third-party partners could data without users’ knowledge. Senator John Thune of South Dakota talked about the need for Facebook to avoid creating “a privacy nightmare.”
Fact Check: What Mark Zuckerberg Said About Facebook, Privacy and Russia
Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook’s chief executive, is testifying before Congress on Tuesday and Wednesday to answer questions about the social network’s failure to protect the data of millions of its users and its role in Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.
Here are some of Mr. Zuckerberg’s claims, as well as some claims from the lawmakers, which we fact checked. The page will be updated throughout the hearings.
‘Your user agreement sucks’: Mark Zuckerberg’s Senate grilling, in 10 key moments
Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg's testimony before a joint Senate panel Tuesday dragged on for hours, so if you missed much of it, we won't blame you. But if you're trying to catch up on the key points, we've drawn out a few important moments from the high-profile hearing. Here they are.
Everyone knew that Zuckerberg would be entering the hearing with an apologetic tone; in his prepared remarks, Zuckerberg conceded that the Cambridge Analytica fiasco was "my mistake, and I'm sorry." But Zuckerberg also went further, acknowledging for the first time that his platform is ultimately responsible for the content that appears there. That's significant for a company that has historically presented itself as a neutral technology.